Premium

Unlock Premium Features

Advanced AI, priority support, and exclusive templates

Upgrade Now
Selection Criteria & Government Jobs

Blog

How Long Should Selection Criteria Responses Be?

By AI Resume Craft Team · Published 8 August 2026

There's no single, universal word limit for selection criteria responses in Australia — it varies by agency, role level, and sometimes by individual job ad. What matters more than memorising a number is understanding why limits exist and how to use the space you're given effectively.

Typical Word Limits by Role Type

While every job ad should be checked individually, some rough patterns hold across Australian government recruitment:

  • Entry-level and administrative roles (APS1–APS4, general administration officer positions) — often 150–300 words per criterion, or a short combined pitch.
  • Mid-level and specialist roles (APS5–APS6, project officer positions) — commonly 250–400 words per criterion.
  • Management roles (EL1 and above) — often 400–500 words per criterion, or a comprehensive combined pitch of up to two pages.
  • Health and education roles — formats vary significantly by state and employer; some ask for a single statement of claims rather than per-criterion responses.

Always treat the specific job ad or application portal instructions as the authority — these figures are a general guide, not a rule.

Why Word Limits Exist

Word limits serve two purposes. Practically, they keep the volume of reading manageable for a panel assessing dozens or sometimes hundreds of applications. But they're also a genuine part of the assessment — writing a clear, complete, evidence-based answer within a constraint is itself a workplace skill, and panels notice candidates who can do it well.

This is why simply writing as much as possible isn't a good strategy even when there's no hard enforcement of the limit. A rambling 600-word response to a 300-word limit reads as an inability to prioritise information, which undermines the content no matter how strong the underlying example is.

How to Write Concisely Without Losing Impact

Cut the setup, keep the substance. The Situation and Task portions of a STAR response should be brief — one or two sentences each. Most of your word count should go to the Action and Result, which is where the actual evidence lives.

Use specific numbers instead of qualifying phrases. "Significantly improved" costs the same number of words as "reduced by 30%" but says far less. Concrete figures pack more evidence per word.

Cut adjectives that don't add information. Words like "successfully," "effectively," and "efficiently" are often just filler — the result itself should demonstrate success without needing to be labelled as successful.

Write the Result first, then work backward. If you're struggling to fit within a limit, draft the outcome you want to highlight first, then include only as much Situation and Task detail as is needed for that Result to make sense.

Read it aloud once you're near the limit. Sentences that are hard to say in one breath are often good candidates for tightening.

A Before-and-After Example

Before (78 words, unfocused):

"In my previous role I was responsible for a number of different tasks including customer service and administrative duties. I always try to communicate effectively with everyone I work with because I believe communication is very important in any workplace. There was a time when I had to deal with a difficult customer situation and I was able to successfully resolve the issue through effective communication and problem-solving skills."

After (52 words, specific):

"A customer was upset about a delayed order and raised their voice at the front counter. I moved the conversation to a quieter area, listened without interrupting, and offered two concrete resolution options. The customer left satisfied and later left positive feedback specifically about how the situation was handled."

The second version uses fewer words but says more — it's specific, structured, and ends with an outcome a reader can evaluate.

Getting Started

If you're staring at a word limit and a blank page, our AI selection criteria writer can help — describe your real experience and the specific limit you're working with, and it drafts a STAR-structured response sized to fit. Review our full guide on how to address selection criteria for the complete process.

Ready to put this into practice?

Draft a concise STAR response with AI

FAQs

Some application portals enforce a hard cut-off and simply won't accept text beyond the limit; others accept it but panels may disregard content past the stated limit, or view it as a sign you can't follow instructions or write concisely.

Not necessarily, as long as the response is complete and specific — but a response that's dramatically shorter than the limit often means an example lacks enough detail to be convincing. Aim to use most of the available space with substance, not padding.